week 4
feedback:
- the “tension” and “resolution” between the two works weren’t completely clear. – what is the tension, what is the resolution, what did you learn, and where do you want to take it?
- Include cultural and contextual perspective? I implicitly assumed a globally uniform “food culture”, and suggest incorporating a discussion on cultural differences. – I’m not saying everyone is addicted to their phone, but it’s especially true in urban, digital societies
- When finally translated into visual items, its impact may be diminished, carrying the risk of a disconnect between words and deeds.
Conversations with Billie Muraben
- being critical doesn’t mean being negative — it means engaging thoughtfully with both good and bad aspects. reflective, balanced position? YES
2. Explain the difference between your work and the reference artist’s work. Include multiple examples (not just one artist)
3. Provide evidence to back up ideas. – citations or quotes from other authors, critics, or journalists
4. adding historical examples to show depth
5. Main text = clear, readable explanation
Side text, captions, or inserted writing = poetic or emotional layer?
FINAL
Leave a Reply